<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
><channel><title>Gadgetopolis &#187; t-mobile</title> <atom:link href="http://www.gadgetopolis.com/posts/7tag/t-mobile/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.gadgetopolis.com</link> <description>Gadget News, Analyzed</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 02:10:58 +0000</lastBuildDate> <language>en</language> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator> <atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/> <item><title>Google&#8217;s Nexus One Sales Model Isn&#8217;t Quite the Barrier Buster</title><link>http://www.gadgetopolis.com/posts/7250</link> <comments>http://www.gadgetopolis.com/posts/7250#comments</comments> <pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 04:53:03 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>George Thiruva</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Consumer Issues]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Handhelds/Smartphones]]></category> <category><![CDATA[android]]></category> <category><![CDATA[google]]></category> <category><![CDATA[gsm]]></category> <category><![CDATA[nexus one]]></category> <category><![CDATA[smartphone]]></category> <category><![CDATA[t-mobile]]></category><guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.gadgetopolis.com/?p=250</guid> <description><![CDATA[<div
style="margin: 5px 10px; display: inline; float: right;"><img
class="size-medium wp-image-251" title="NexusOneOnSide" src="http://maxcdn.gadgetopolis.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/NexusOneOnSide-300x236.png" alt="Nexus One In Portrait Mode" width="300" height="236" /></div><div
class="excerpt" dir="ltr" style="margin-top:10px;">In the days preceding the release of the Google Nexus One (a.k.a. The long awaited gPhone), the talk of the web was that Google was going to break down some sort of Berlin Wall in the way the phone was sold. Whereas most phones are sold by the wireless carriers in conjunction with a 2 Year jail sentence and are locked to that carrier, Google was (and did) sell the phone both direct to customers, unlocked to a carrier, and without the need to put handcuffs on.<p
style="margin-top: 10px; padding-left: 30px;margin-bottom: 0px;"><strong>Q.</strong> But did it really accomplish that result?</p><p
style="padding-left: 30px;"><strong>A.</strong> Sort of.</p><p
style="padding-left: 30px;margin-bottom: 0px;"><strong>Q.</strong> Did it shake things up and change the way wireless phones are (and will be) sold?</p><p
style="padding-left: 30px;"><strong>A.</strong> Hopefully, but probably not.</p><p
style="padding-left: 30px;margin-bottom: 0px;"><strong>Q.</strong> Did the company that pledges to "Do No Evil" really free customers from the tyranny of the wireless carrier oligopoly?</p><p
style="padding-left: 30px;"><strong>A.</strong> Doesn't seem that way.</p>Let's take a look at Google's cell phone math and see how things really turned out ...</div>]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.gadgetopolis.com/posts/7250/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>14</slash:comments> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Served from: www.gadgetopolis.com @ 2010-09-04 22:02:25 by W3 Total Cache -->