<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
><channel><title>Gadgetopolis &#187; Cell Phones</title> <atom:link href="http://www.gadgetopolis.com/posts/7category/consumer-electronics/telephony/cell-phones/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.gadgetopolis.com</link> <description>Gadget News, Analyzed</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 02:10:58 +0000</lastBuildDate> <language>en</language> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator> <atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/> <item><title>Updating to Android 2.2 (Froyo) for the Impatient</title><link>http://www.gadgetopolis.com/posts/7733</link> <comments>http://www.gadgetopolis.com/posts/7733#comments</comments> <pubDate>Sat, 22 May 2010 21:42:09 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>George Thiruva</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Cell Phones]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Handhelds/Smartphones]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Software/Apps]]></category> <category><![CDATA[android]]></category> <category><![CDATA[froyo]]></category> <category><![CDATA[install]]></category> <category><![CDATA[installation]]></category> <category><![CDATA[upgrade]]></category><guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.gadgetopolis.com/?p=733</guid> <description><![CDATA[There&#8217;s been lots of buzz on Twitter, TechCrunch, Engadget and everywhere about Nexus One owners beginning to receive the much anticipated &#8220;Froyo&#8221; release of the Android operating system. Apparently, it&#8217;s on a very slow release schedule. For some users, it may take up to three weeks before they receive the update &#8220;over the air&#8221;. But [...]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.gadgetopolis.com/posts/7733/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>32</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Google/HTC&#8217;s Nexus One is only $49 (in a manner of speaking)</title><link>http://www.gadgetopolis.com/posts/7315</link> <comments>http://www.gadgetopolis.com/posts/7315#comments</comments> <pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 01:59:01 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>George Thiruva</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Handhelds/Smartphones]]></category> <category><![CDATA[android]]></category> <category><![CDATA[contracts]]></category> <category><![CDATA[google]]></category> <category><![CDATA[mobile]]></category> <category><![CDATA[nexus one]]></category> <category><![CDATA[smartphone]]></category><guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.gadgetopolis.com/?p=315</guid> <description><![CDATA[<div
style="margin: 5px 10px; display: inline; float: right;"><img
class="size-medium wp-image-251" title="NexusOneOnSide" src="http://maxcdn.gadgetopolis.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/NexusOneOnSide-300x236.png" alt="Nexus One In Portrait Mode" width="300" height="236" /></div><div
class="excerpt" style="margin-top: 10px;" dir="ltr"><p>Would you like to get the Google/HTC Nexus One <em>Superphone</em> for a cool $49?</p><p>What if I also threw in the unlocked version of the phone?</p><p>Now what if I also said you don't need to sign a two year contract?</p><p>And no - it's not stolen. Perfectly legit!</p><p>How is this possible? Let's do some math ...</p></div>]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.gadgetopolis.com/posts/7315/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>51</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Google&#8217;s Nexus One Sales Model Isn&#8217;t Quite the Barrier Buster</title><link>http://www.gadgetopolis.com/posts/7250</link> <comments>http://www.gadgetopolis.com/posts/7250#comments</comments> <pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 04:53:03 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>George Thiruva</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Consumer Issues]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Handhelds/Smartphones]]></category> <category><![CDATA[android]]></category> <category><![CDATA[google]]></category> <category><![CDATA[gsm]]></category> <category><![CDATA[nexus one]]></category> <category><![CDATA[smartphone]]></category> <category><![CDATA[t-mobile]]></category><guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.gadgetopolis.com/?p=250</guid> <description><![CDATA[<div
style="margin: 5px 10px; display: inline; float: right;"><img
class="size-medium wp-image-251" title="NexusOneOnSide" src="http://maxcdn.gadgetopolis.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/NexusOneOnSide-300x236.png" alt="Nexus One In Portrait Mode" width="300" height="236" /></div><div
class="excerpt" dir="ltr" style="margin-top:10px;">In the days preceding the release of the Google Nexus One (a.k.a. The long awaited gPhone), the talk of the web was that Google was going to break down some sort of Berlin Wall in the way the phone was sold. Whereas most phones are sold by the wireless carriers in conjunction with a 2 Year jail sentence and are locked to that carrier, Google was (and did) sell the phone both direct to customers, unlocked to a carrier, and without the need to put handcuffs on.<p
style="margin-top: 10px; padding-left: 30px;margin-bottom: 0px;"><strong>Q.</strong> But did it really accomplish that result?</p><p
style="padding-left: 30px;"><strong>A.</strong> Sort of.</p><p
style="padding-left: 30px;margin-bottom: 0px;"><strong>Q.</strong> Did it shake things up and change the way wireless phones are (and will be) sold?</p><p
style="padding-left: 30px;"><strong>A.</strong> Hopefully, but probably not.</p><p
style="padding-left: 30px;margin-bottom: 0px;"><strong>Q.</strong> Did the company that pledges to "Do No Evil" really free customers from the tyranny of the wireless carrier oligopoly?</p><p
style="padding-left: 30px;"><strong>A.</strong> Doesn't seem that way.</p>Let's take a look at Google's cell phone math and see how things really turned out ...</div>]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.gadgetopolis.com/posts/7250/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>14</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>It&#8217;s App Overload at CES!</title><link>http://www.gadgetopolis.com/posts/787</link> <comments>http://www.gadgetopolis.com/posts/787#comments</comments> <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 19:17:13 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>John Hong</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Home Theater]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Software]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Software/Apps]]></category> <category><![CDATA[app stores]]></category> <category><![CDATA[apps]]></category> <category><![CDATA[ces]]></category><guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.gadgetopolis.com/?p=87</guid> <description><![CDATA[<img
class="alignright size-medium wp-image-86" src="http://maxcdn.gadgetopolis.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/cc_icons-300x227.png" alt="" width="300" height="227" />The two big topics at CES this year seem 3D and Apps. But app-mania (really app platform mania) seems to be a faster spreading disease than swine flu. And it seems liket every CE manufacturer has now caught it. We're not just talking about apps on cell phones platforms like iPhone and Android.  Samsung, Vizio, Boxee, Roku, and even the Ford Motor Company. The real trouble with all of these new app platforms is many of them are all new platforms - incompatible with iPhone/Android. Are these companies really thinking that they can all attract thousands of developer to write to their API just because they said the magic word?]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.gadgetopolis.com/posts/787/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>3</slash:comments> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Served from: www.gadgetopolis.com @ 2010-09-04 22:20:47 by W3 Total Cache -->