The Sad History and (maybe) Bright Future of TiVo

TiVo's Outdoor Inflatable at CES

TiVo Relaxes on his Recliner Outside the CES Convention Hall

For a company that hasn’t announced a new hardware platform in years, TiVo seems to be all abuzz in recent weeks.

It’s been a long time since TiVo released a major new hardware product – about 3 1/2 years since the last major DVR release, the high definition Series3. Sure, they also released the TiVo HD and HD XL, but those were just variations on the Series3 with no significant new features.

Investors need something to cheer about. For pretty much the last three years, TiVo has been losing subscribers every quarter.

Fans like me were waiting for something new. I speculated on (or rather dreamed about) what might be coming prior to the start of CES. But TiVo disappointed us and announced nothing new at the big show.

But now TiVo looks like it’s waking up from its hibernation and is ready to do something. Oh, but what? …

TiVo Event Invite

Wow! Not Underselling this at all. TiVo's really going all Apple here with this show!

The Big Announcement
For starters, TiVo has scheduled an announcement – a big announcement to be held at nothing less than the top of the Empire State Building 30 Rockefeller Center. (I wonder if they’ll have a statue of King Kong holding a TiVo doll in his hand. Alec Baldwin, Tina Fey, and the “Kenneth” guy will be there.)

And they do need to announce something big. TiVo’s subscriber numbers are down – way down. In just the last reported quarter (Q3 2009) TiVo lost about 10% of their subscribers – and nearly 40% of their peak reported numbers versus January 2007. That puts them at about 2.7 million subscribers at the end of last October (At the peak they were at about 4.4 million.)

TiVo Quarterly Subscription Data

Three years of subscription declines at TiVo(click to enlarge)

TiVo the icon
This is the story of an iconic company that’s losing its icon status. very few companies have had their company or product named turned into a verb:

I Xeroxed the memo. (Even though I used a Canon)
I Googled a review of that movie and it doesn’t look interesting.
I Tivo’d Heroes (even though one might have used the cable company’s crappy DVR)

But “to TiVo” is seemingly losing favor. And people are actually starting to use the generic “to DVR”. If you Google for these terms and look at the number of pages matched, you’ll see. “I DVR’ed Heroes,” just doesn’t sound right – it’s that extra syllable.

False starts and missteps
When you look at that graph of subscription gains/declines, it makes you wonder just what TiVo has been doing for the last three years? Even prior to that, how can a brand be so well recognized, yet so unpopular? Even at 4.4 million, that’s less than 4% of US TV households. And it’s been almost 11 years since the first TiVo went on sale.

A lot of fighting against the Man
When I think about it myself, I wanted a TiVo ever since I first heard about it. In its early days, cable TV was virtually all analog. But, anyone that subscribed to premium channels or upper tier packaged channels was forced to use a descrambler box that they could only get from their cable company. So for TiVo to record a program on a scrambled channel, it had to somehow control the cable box – customers had to deal with two boxes to watch TV. To gain control, TiVo users had to install a MacGyver type contraption to allow the TiVo box to send infrared remote control signals through a series of mirrors to the cable set top box. That intimidated a lot of potential customers.

The next problem was that using a cable box may nullify one of TiVo’s best features – the ability to watch a live program while recording another. If the channels that you want to watch and record are both scrambled, you couldn’t do it since the typical cable box could only descramble one channel at a time. And my cable company at the time scrambled everything except the over the air channels. So, myself and others waited.

Then, a little into the new century, digital cable started to become popular with the promise of a myriad of new channels to choose from. Initially, this only made matters worse for TiVo. Many of those who might have not subscribed to premium channels now found themselves enticed by some of the new digital-only channels: DIY Network, Fine Living, Home and Garden Television, BBC America. Those not willing to give up dual tuner functionality went elsewhere.

Even more trouble for TiVo: high definition over-the-air digital broadcasting was also charging forward. Missing the boat on HD was entirely TiVo’s fault (at least when talking about over-the-air HD). HD broadcasts were set to begin on a wide scale in 2002. Cable companies weren’t quite ready for the HD launch, but neither was TiVo. The availability of HD (which is inherently digital) helped push cable companies to move further into the digital space.

The inability to tune over-the-air high definition and scrambled cable (digital or analog) became major un-selling points for TiVo – especially amongst the most profitable videophile market as well as much of America – the non-technical crowd – that don’t want to mess around with remote control hacks and stuff like that.

For both crowds it would be until the Fall of 2006 before an answer came from TiVo.

In order to address digital cable, TiVo would have to wait for the cable industry to comply with a Congressional mandate to open up to third party set top box makers. The idea, as mandated by Congress was well intentioned, but the follow through by the FCC, was disastrous. The mandate came in 1996, but it wasn’t until 2005 that it became a reality. The outcome, was a clunky, feature lacking system called CableCard. At first it was welcomed with open arms by consumer electronics manufacturers. Many TV’s from Sony, Panasonic, Samsung, and other companies were rolled out with slots for CableCards.

In theory, CableCard allowed any company to make a device (televisions, recorders, simple tuners, etc) which would absorb the functionality of a traditional cable TV set top box – the key feature being the ability to descramble scrambled content. The cable company would provide a CableCard to customers for low or no cost which would make the CableCard device compatible with the cable companies decryption systems. So without the need to rent a set top box from the cable company, one could use a device bought online or at a local electronics store which would be able to descramble channels itself.

In the case of TiVo, CableCard meant that the TiVo box could finally record one scrambled channel while letting you watch another – or you can just record two programs at once while you watch a totally different, pre-recorded program.

So while CableCard solved some problems, there were still a few other problems for TiVo and other CableCard implementers:

  1. CableCards still had to be rented from the cable company. The hopes of saving money while not not needing to rent a box were not there. (In my case, Cox Communications charges me $2 per card).
  2. CableCards had to be professionally installed – not DIY . So, customers would still have to pay an installation fee on top of the monthly fee – no different than the old fashioned set-top-box environment. (Update 2010-2-25 7:30PM PST: Commenter Max Williams (see comments below) indicates that some cable operators in some regions do allow for a self-install of the CableCard and at no-cost for rental)
  3. The initial CableCards only let devices decode one channel at a time. For TiVo, that meant to record one show while watching another live show, TiVo had to have two CableCard slots. And customers would have to rent two CableCards.(In my case, that’s $4 a month)
  4. CableCard was not compatible with the interactive features of digital cable systems – anything that required sending a signal to the cable company and awaiting a response: namely Video On Demand/Pay-per-view.

Add it up and consumers are largely not interested in CableCard – maybe with the exception of the videophile market. But the cost and complexity are too much for most people.

To this day, many of these problems remain in the cable TV market. A couple of things have changed. For one, a new iteration of the CableCard standard came out allowing for decoding on multiple channels while using a single CableCard. This was called CableCard 2.0, aka the M-Card card. But M-Cards didn’t eliminate the need for a CableCard rental or professional installation. And they still didn’t provide compatibility with Video On Demand and other two way services.

DirecTiVo
The big rise in the chart was due to the existence of the so-called “DirecTiVo” boxes – TiVo devices which were compatible with the DirecTV satellite TV system. The vast majority of the rented subscriptions were DirecTV customers. As opposed to retail cable TV TiVo users, DirecTiVo users had very few problems with their TiVos.

But sales went down when DirecTV stopped working with TiVo in 2004/2005 and delivered its own DVR made by NDS (At the time Rupert Murdoch’s News Corp had gained controlling ownership over both DirecTV and NDS). On top of that, DirecTV was in the middle of launching new satellites to expand their lineup of HD and local market channels. The new satellites began using a new compression system (MPEG4) for the broadcast of signals. That meant that happy TiVo users would not be able to access and record the new channels unless they switched to a new NDS DVR.

This was horrible news for TiVo. At the peak of subscriptions, roughly 2/3 of TiVo’s subscribers were DirecTiVo users.

You can also see that retail TiVo box subscriptions for cable TV users was still climbing after the loss of new DirecTV sales. But, with the problems that we just mentioned regarding TiVo and cable, sales and subscriptions weren’t climbing fast enough to make up for the sharp loss of DirecTV users. Now, even cable TV user subscriptions are falling.

Yet more future solutions
Naturally, the remaining problems with cable have sparked complaints from both consumers and consumer electronics manufacturers who claim that the cable industry intentionally designed CableCard to be a flawed system to protect their set-top-box rental revenue as well as control over content that consumers could access (like Internet delivered content). The FCC called for some changes. CableLabs, the collaborative technology development arm of the cable television industry attempted to allay complaints with two, still controversial, proposals.

tru2way
The first solution is called tru2way. tru2way would give CableCard using devices access to two way services. But, yes, it will still require the use of a CableCard – so consumers still have the two unpalatable problems of requiring an installation appointment as well as the monthly rental fee associated with CableCard. But cost and installation time aside, it claims to bring tru2way compatible devices up to functional parity for the first time ever with cable company rented equipment.

But tru2way is not without its complaints. First, the biggest cable operators in the US pledged to have their network tru2way compliant by July 1 of last year. As of today, there still aren’t any tru2way ready cable system (aside from some small test markets). In TiVo’s financial statement issued last November, TiVo said that it was working with Comcast on tru2way implementation but was still a year away (maybe 9 months now?).

Additionally, many electronics makers, TiVo included have complained that tru2way ceded too much control over the user interface to the cable companies. Instead of being a set of standards for defining a request/response protocol between a tru2way box and the cable system, tru2way specifies that two way services will be activated by requiring the device to download a Java based software application, which would take control of the screen and interact with the user. For die-hard TiVo fans, that’s extremely nerve wrecking to risk giving up a beloved user interface for one created by the not-so-beloved cable company.

The biggest problem with tru2way seems to be that it’s still largely vaporware. Only Comcast seems to have a working tru2way cable system – and only in about three cities nationwide.

DCAS
There’s yet one more future technology in the air. A second proposed solution from CableLabs is called Downloadable Conditional Access System (DCAS). DCAS promises to clear up all of the problems of CableCard. Like tru2way, it would provide a DCAS compliant device with two way capabilities. But, unlike tru2way, it will eliminate the need to rent a card (or anything) from the cable company. Sounds great, but the proposal was first made to the FCC in 2005. The cable industry’s lobbying group, the National Cable & Telecommunications Association (NCTA) promised nationwide support by July 2008. Today it’s nowhere in sight and is presumably dead.

Oh yeah. One more problem: SDV
The latest wrinkle giving heartburn to TiVo, Moxi, and anyone else that still has a stomach for the third party set-top-box market is called Switched Digital Video (SDV). The concept here is that in order to cram even more channels in to the cable lineup, a new technique is needed to avoid running out of frequency space. On traditional cable systems, all channels (scrambled or not) are sent down the cable to every home concurrently. But now, with all of those pay-per-view channels using up space, there is no more space for new channels. So, to add additional channels, digital cable set top boxes can use a concept called Switched Digital Video. Most channels will still be sent down the pipe as usual, but additional channels may be moved into an SDV tier which will only be sent if the digital set top box requests it. As a result, cable companies can theoretically offer an unlimited number of channels. This is a competitive move against satellite providers DirecTV and Dish Networks which have typically offered many more channels than cable – and more coveted high definition channels too.

But now the problem is that third party boxes like TiVo aren’t compatible with SDV. Some cable companies are offering to provide TiVo users with the installation and rental of what’s called an SDV tuning adapter which would share the incoming cable with TiVo and plug into TiVo’s USB port. To tune an SDV channel, TiVo will make that request via USB to the SDV adapter. The SDV adapter, in turn, would then signal the cable system to send down the selected channel over the cable input to the TiVo (or other STB). But, this adds the extra complexity of an extra box supplied by the cable company – which is something that many folks hoped to avoid by going with TiVo in the first place.

[callout title=Coming Attractions]
Curious about Moxi and other DVR options?

Come back soon to check out our upcoming discussion of the Set Top Box Market.

Or, better yet, let Google Feedburner e-mail you when this and other new stories are published.

Just click here to sign up![/callout]

Lots of Lemons. Now, how does TiVo make some Lemonade?
Turning TiVo around is going to take some hard work. There have been some positive pseudo-announcement coming from TiVo over the past couple of years. But no new major products yet.

The most interesting news, for disappointed DirecTV users is that DirecTV and TiVo are working together again to deliver a new TiVo box for the satellite service. But that was announced in 2008. The claim is that the new DirecTV will finally see the light of day in the first half of this year – perhaps as soon as March 2.

Way back in 2006, TiVo announced similar partnerships to develop proprietary DVRs for the Comcast and Cox cable systems. In the case of Comcast and Cox, TiVo is working to make their software (parts of it at least) available for download onto certain Motorola manufactured DVRs – not terribly exciting.

More recently, TiVo announced a similar joint development effort with RCN. This seems to be a lot more interesting as this is both a hardware and software project. TiVo will be promoted and sold by RCN as the premier DVR for the RCN system. Additionally, TiVo, RCN, and a third party technology company, SeaChange, worked to engineer both two-way capabilities (for Video on Demand and other interactive services) as well as SDV support without using tru2way or an SDV tuning adapter.

What about TiVo’s retail offerings?
This could be where things get very interesting. The wording on TiVo’s invitation for their March 2 announcement (“Inventing the DVR was just a warmup.”) makes you think that they have something fun planned. That wording makes for an incredibly bold claim – and sets them up for high expectations. A simple downloadable version of TiVo for Cox and Comcast doesn’t sound that exciting. Even, the RCN endeavor (while great news for RCN users), doesn’t sound inventive enough to make the TiVo’s founding invention look like a “warmup.”

But two-way and switched digital video are probably way off the table – otherwise TiVo wouldn’t have just filed a complaint about the cable industry to the FCC last week (PDF of complaint here).

Of course, there’s still plenty of room for innovation in the retail market as I posted numerous potential new features back in early January. And I’m sure TiVo’s engineers have been dreaming up other ideas over the last few years.

Then there’s always the accidentally leaked TiVo Premier product – which doesn’t look it would anything new. But if introduced in conjunction with a radically new retail product, then we might be looking at something good. The TiVo Premier could play the role of an inexpensive entry-level product. With the new technology product on the high end – with a high end price.

One of the past complaints about TiVo is its price. The Premier, while sporting largely no improvements over the existing HD product, could be enticing to many new TiVo customers if it came in at a lower price. Being a new design, the Premier could take advantage of new, lower cost components which match the power of the components in the older HD in order to come in at a new lower price point. This would especially useful if they finally pull the plug on the current low end $149, standard definition only Series2 box. With HDTV’s dominating the store shelves – even on the low end – TiVo is going to need a low end HD DVR if it wants to play better in the low end of the market.

Advertising and Data Services
Another area for potential growth are their advertising and data services. TiVo displays links to ads on the TiVo main menu, when you hit the pause button in the middle of a program, and in other spots. Regular TV commercials can also get TiVo specific services that work in conjunction with actual airing of the commercial – even if you’re fast forwarding through it. For instance, while fast forwarding though a commercial, TiVo will sound a chime and display a TiVo superimposed message asking you to press the “Thumbs Up” button on the remote control for more information. TV networks can also use the service to enable the Thumbs Up button to instants schedule a recording for a show that’s being recorded in a commercial.

The data service is quite fascinating. It’s like the old Nielsen TV ratings system on steroids. Being a pretty smart computer, a TiVo box can track viewing habits down to a resolution of only one second. The data can be sold to advertisers who want to know things like: what commercials do people watch versus skip or fast forward over, are certain parts of a program watched more than once, or in segment based shows (like Saturday Night Live) do people only watch certain parts of the show (maybe the “Weekend Update” segment of SNL is the most popular and might have a higher value for commercials than the opening monologue).

But for advertising and data services to really make money, TiVo needs more subscribers. I frequently hear people complain about the monthly fee as being a reason not to get a TiVo. But if the price of TiVo monthly service can be brought down - ideally to zero, TiVo might be able to attract more subscribers and boost the value of the data and advertising businesses. (The common complaint about paying TiVo a monthly fee is that TiVo service essentially is just for getting program guide data – which is largely free online via TVGuide, Zap2It and other places. And TiVo itself is getting the guide data from the same source that many of the free advertising supported online listing sites get their data from – Tribune Media Services)

There’s a couple of independent ways to achieve this. its key to note that TiVo probably doesn’t make much money from the retail sale of the box – the service revenues are needed to bring TiVo over the top. If advertising and data sales can be used to better monetize the service, then that revenue can be used to bring down the monthly service fee – which will in-turn bring in more customers. One recent monetization route was inked with Google. Google, which now sells traditional television commercial air time though its AdWords service now has access to TiVo’s usage data – which helps ad buyers make more informed decisions before bidding on advertising slots.

Secondly, if TiVo is better able to drive down the manufacturing cost of the presumed TiVo Premier, then it can be more profitable at the time of sale. With a more profitable box, there’s less of a need to rely on monthly service fees as a tool to recoup a loss on the box. So, that gives TiVo a second way to bring the monthly service down – and bring down the cost of the set-it-and-forget-it lifetime subscription fee. They should even be able to sell a moderately priced retail product that simply includes lifetime service (taking a page from the ARRIS Group’s Moxi DVR playbook).

When TiVo was younger, most of their customers used the TiVo device’s built in modem to dial-in (yuck) to the TiVo service nightly to get updates program guide data and such. As broadband Internet connectivity has gotten more popular in the decade since TiVo’s creation, dial-in service is less important. Dial-in modem banks are also quite laborious and expensive to maintain. I would hope that TiVo’s newest products completely abandon support for dial-in data access. Since I would suspect that most of TiVo’s recently acquired customers use their Internet broadband connection to access the TiVo service, this should be an easy feature to drop (otherwise, how did Netflix Watch Now, Roku, Boxee, and Popcorn Hour all get so popular?). Any infrastructure TiVo was maintaining to provide the dial-in data service can be eliminated to save money.

When the service can be purely driven over the Internet, the marginal cost of providing the service goes down to near zero. But the value for advertising and data goes up.

The Road Ahead
Going forward, TiVo definitely has some potential bright spots in the future. The biggest near term revenue contributor will likely be the new DirecTiVo box. While presenting TiVo with a much smaller market of potential customers, TiVo’s box for RCN looks like it’ll be a winner. As for Cox and Comcast, while they are both huge operators, a software only download for their existing DVR rentals doesn’t sound all that promising – especially since, in Comcast’s case, the operator seems to be giving TiVo service away for free to their Comcast DVR users. At a price of nothing, how would TiVo make money from that? Maybe TiVo is getting a cut of the $9.95 monthly fee for the Comcast DVR rental. Or TiVo is hoping that data and advertising make the endeavor profitable – which is n0t entirely a bad idea if it attracts millions of new service users.

As far as retail goes, that seems to be the most closely guarded part of TiVo’s plans. But it sounds like we can expect a new high end product and maybe also see the Premier unveiled as the new low end product at the March 2 event. And if TiVo can lower their monthly service fees they can achieve a critical mass to make their advertising and data services more popular.

TiVo’s future still has some bumps in the road to overcome, but with the right moves it should eventually be pretty smooth.

Update (2010-2-25 6:30PM PST):
Engadget received a leaked screenshot from what purports to be the BestBuy inventory application for employees. If true, TiVo’s Premier device will begin shipping on March 27 and will largely mirror the TiVo HD and HD XL in pricing ($299/$499). The bullet items in the screenshot seem to indicate not much change as well from the HD and HD XL. So the hardware capabilities seems to be as expected. But the screenshots also indicate that there’s no change in pricing for the TiVo service.

BusinessWeek is also reporting their guess on the March 2 announcement. But BusinessWeek (which is going off of a quote from TiVo CEO Tom Rogers) is expecting an announcement about an ability to search for programming on both TV and Internet sources like YouTube and Amazon Video On Demand. Unless there’s some detail we don’t yet know, this doesn’t seem all that new since TiVo already launched the beta version of its new TiVO Search about a year ago. For those that don’t haven’t seen an HD TiVO, here’s a YouTube video that shows the TiVO Search in action:

[tubepress video="iPirnN_z9Cw" hd="true" showRelated="false" showInfo="false"]

Of course, Tom Roger’s comment to BW on the topic was “You will see us talk about a stunning new way to make the process of finding and selecting video a truly wonderful experience for the consumer.” So, maybe the BusinessWeek reporters aren’t that familiar with TiVo and interpreted that statement to mean what many TiVo users already know as the TiVo Search Beta. Of course, there’s lots of room for improvement in the Beta – and maybe that’s what Rogers was alluding to. If you watch the above video, you can see that entering search text is kind of slow with just the arrow keys on the remote. As I hoped for before, the search can be sped up by keyboard as well as overall hardware improvements like a faster CPU and I/O.